|
Herodontic cases and a humble 1 year recall
The opinions within this web page are not ours.Authors have been credited for the individual posts where they are. - www.rxroots.com photographs courtesy: Jared From: Bojidar Kafelov To: ROOTS Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:37 AM Subject: [roots] Herodontic cases and a humble 1 year recall I'm afraid that I can't participate in this beautiful and full of sportsmanship argument about the 20 yr recalls etc. My humble and maybe not fully experienced opinion is that I want to see - that is the whole point of the scope, the CBCT, loupes etc. If I can't see where I'm going I can't be sure of what I'm doing, so I want my access clean and visible all the way! I'm not saying that everybody should do what I do, but I work that way and until now it works for me and most importantly my patients. Here is something to argue about: Case 1(Case report 59-62): I've posted it earlier but don't know if it got trough! Endo-perio lesion with secondary pulp involvement. Delayed answer to stimuli but painful to hot/cold and the pain persisted after removing the hot source for about 30 sec. I thought it will be a good thing to repost this case regarding the access argument. Case 2 (Case report 70): Herodontic from all points of view - fractured instrument, perforation, not enough tooth structure....but the patient wants her teeth.... So a perio-endo team was formed to do whatever it could. Case 3 (Case report 69): A humble 1 year recall - you'll be the judges. Please note the access again - 4 canals, distal canals with thin isthmus between them. Any comments are more than welcome, critics are welcome too! Best regards, Bojidar
