Check Page Ranking

Home
Dental tourism
Conferences
New additions
Dental books
FREE journals
Bad breath
Kids caries
Smoking effects
Patient info
Dental Videos
Latest news
ROOTS cases
Wisdom tooth
Diabetes
Drugs of choice

Endo tips    Better Endo    Endo abstracts    Endo discussions

MB2 12 month MSDO recall - Courtesy ROOTS
The opinions within this web page are not ours. Authors have been credited
for the individual posts and photographs where they are. Photo courtesy: Rod Tataryn - www.rxroots.com

From: Rod Tataryn
To: ROOTS
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 9:59 AM
Subject: [roots] 12 month MSDO Recall (iCat)

This 56 year old female patient presented last year with primary 
symptoms of a chronic, long-standing (two years) left maxillary 
sinusitis and vague dental pain in her ULQ.  She had been on 
multiple rounds of antibiotic regimens and was considering functional 
endoscopic sinus surgery at the recommendation of her ENT.

Percussion of both #13 and #15 were positive which were difficult 
to interpret being joined by the bridge and in such
close proximity to the sinus.  Also, multiple radiographs were 
difficult to read due to the zygoma and low palatal vault.
Furthermore, I was not comfortable relying on the negative cold 
response in #15 through the ceramic restoration, as her
other crowned teeth were also barely responsive to cold stimuli 
with endo ice.

I sent this patient for an iCat (digital CT scan) requesting 
specific cuts of tooth #15.  The image shows significant
mucosal edema in the floor of her left maxillary sinus and 
faint evidence of a periapical radiolucency on the palatal
root of #15 which was difficult to recognize on her PA radiograph.  
I suspected MSDO (maxillary sinusitis of dental origin).



Root canal therapy was recommended for tooth #15 and the access 
cavity was performed without anesthesia as a test. There was 
minimal response to drilling and a necrotic pulp was found 
upon access.  Root canal therapy was completed.



The patients sinusitis symptoms resolved within just a few days 
after endodontic treatment and have not returned.
I recently sent her back for a one-year follow up iCat image 
to compare to her original.



The floor of the sinus shows healthy mucosal tissue with no 
evidence of edema.  She has remained symptom free since her
root canal therapy.  No further adjunctive sinus treatment 
has been performed - Rod

Really neat, Rod.  I'm betting a ton of sinus surgery is 
done due to PA pathology.  Guy

Guy, It is generally accepted in the medical literature that 
10-15% of maxillary sinus pathology is secondary to dental
infection.  Some studies have shown it could be much higher 
One found 40.6% and another found 47% of chronic sinus
infections to be secondary to dental pathosis.

Approximately 350,000 sinus surgeries are performed annually 
in the U.S.  These are typically last resort treatments on
long-standing chronic rhinosinusitis cases that have failed 
to respond to multiple antibiotic regimens.

Some sinus surgeries are very necessary; deviated septums, 
cysts, polyps etc can block the ostium and inhibit proper
drainage.  However, there is no doubt that many are attempts 
to relieve symptoms but likely do not address the true
etiology of the disease.

Take a look at this study.

Acta Otolaryngol. 1994 Nov;114(6):657-62.
Radiologic assessment of diseased mucosa of the maxillary 
sinus after functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
Min YG, Lee JW, Shin JS.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University 
College of Medicine, Korea.

We attempted to evaluate postoperative mucosal changes and 
symptomatic improvement in 99 patients who underwent functional
endoscopic sinus surgery from September 1991 through August 1992. 
The patients were divided into 2-, 4-, 6-, and 12-month
postoperative groups. Thickness of the maxillary sinus mucosa
measured at the midpoint of the lateral sinus wall on a
follow-up ostiomeatal unit computed tomogram (OMU CT) was compared 
with that of preoperative OMU CT. Postoperative endoscopic findings 
of the maxillary sinus and changes in presenting symptoms such as 
rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, facial pain, headache, anosmia, 
epiphora, and referred otalgia were analyzed. Improvement in the 
diseased mucosa of the maxillary sinus, as evaluated on OMU CT, 
was observed in 69.7% of the patients, and such mucosal changes 
did not differ significantly among 2-, 4-, 6-, and 12-month 
follow-up groups. However, apparent mucosal changes exceeding marginal
improvement was observed in 32.3% of the patients. The overall 
symptomatic improvement rate was 57.9% and improvement in
endoscopic findings was observed in 46.3% of the patients. Although 
there was some discrepancy between radiologic and symptomatic 
improvement rates, symptomatic improvement was significantly related 
with radiologic improvement. It is suggested that removal of 
obstructive lesion in the ostiomeatal area might be beneficial in a 
seemingly early symptomatic improvement, but complete healing of 
the maxillary sinus mucosa as assessed by OMU CT might take longer 
than 12 months.

 ----  How would we judge ourselves with radiographic impovement in 
 only 32.3% of our cases.  Compare these results to the
CT mucosal improvement in my case without the patient having 
undergone any sinus surgery at all.

For a real chuckle, take a look at the final conclusion.

There is much more to properly performed endodontics than most of us 
give ourselves credit for - Rod

I'll go along with this, though I don't think sinus problems 
(especially in some areas of the country like the North
East) are necessarily caused by dental infections in most cases 
(most being as high as 40% or more). I do believe that
there are a lot of previous RCT upper molar teeth that continue 
to be a problem for the max sinuses and lead to chronic
signs and symptoms in this area.  And CT/Scope treatment is very 
helpful for these cases.

I don't know how dentists, especially endodontists, have not been 
sending patients routinely for a CAT and scope of the
sinuses with upper molar symptoms and, especially in this case, 
a pretty obvious sinus problem even with the PA
(whatever the initial cause).

I've been seeing more and more of these "leading" emails on 
dental lists about using CAT scans for upper molar endo
problems for the last year or so with the advent of the 
burgeoning sales forces of the iCat people and other makers of
these "portable" CAT scans (NewTom, another).

These machines are nice, and are useful, but we, as dentists, 
have had access to these machines, these scans and ENT
scopes forever.  Why is it just now becoming the rage?  
In our office we've been scanning and especially scoping,
patients for 15 years on "hard to read" upper molar cases.  
The scope can be especially revealing and treatment, like
removing gran. tissue, can be done on the spot. (And the
removal of a lesion can very well be a critical adjunct and
necessary to a successful first or second RCT treatment)  
But, the scan itself, at the proper scan center, is also being
read by a radiologist for any other peculiarity that may be 
found, most Dx out of the realm of dental diagnosis.

And at the scan center, the patients' medical insurance in most 
cases covers the full scan, not the case in the dental
office proper.

Hard to justify the price of $175-200K for an Endo scanner 
(or whatever other dental pathology cases you can dream up
using these machines for!) The percentage of usage is so small 
in dentistry as to be well taken care of at the scan
center down the street.

Of course, there are dentists out there that feel a negative 
ROI on anything dental, is well worth the costs!!!!!!!!!!
In this case, not even patient care is improved so I'd vote 
not ready for prime time for these machines for general
dentistry and it's even a stretch for surgeons since they 
usually have quick and easy access to machines now.

But, at least there are sales people out there showing dentists 
how to treat these cases.  At least that's a positive
(oh, and the profitability of the scanner company is another 
positive, too!) - Regards,  Kevin Smith

With all due respect, they have not been readily available 
until recently. Cone beam tomography was relatively unknown
5 years ago.  Even today, in the u.s. we have about 700 total 
installations in a country with 300 million. Medical ct has
been available for some time, with a major increase in radiation
exposure to the patient and a major increase in cost of
scan, not to mention inconvenience to the patient 
(300.00 vs. 8-900 in my area)

5 new machines are scheduled to come on the market this year,
possibly the same next year.  There are currently
5 available (if we count the sirona being available the first 
of the year being available now).

I insist the tipping point for this technology will be 100k.  
Once it gets to that level, I think many practitioners will
embrace the multitude of benefits of 3d imaging - Gary

Kevin, To clarify, the vast majority of rhinosinusitis cases 
are acute with the leading cause being ostial blockage from 
mucosal edema in response to an allergen.  These clearly have 
nothing to do with dental pathosis, although they can cause a 
patient to experience "molar tooth pain" due to pressure and 
anatomic proximity or heterotropic convergence from the 
sensitive ostium.

The 40+ percentage is not of "all sinusitis", but is rather a 
percentage of only the chronic, non-resolving cases that
have not responded to antibiotic, adjunctive or surgical therapies.

I share your appreciation of CT imaging in diagnosis, but I should 
clarify that under no circumstances do I use them to "diagnose" a 
sinusitis, rather to aid in my dental diagnosis.  I leave the 
sinus diagnosis to the ENT's.

I just hope they reciprocate by leaving the dental diagnosis 
to me. :-))) - Rod

I follow that now.  But I've had a few cases whereby the 
CAT/scope procedure by the ENT cleared out the soft tissue
lesion and then was followed by successful (so far) RCT.  
I've always felt that some RCT upper molars that do not fully
resolve (transient symptoms, etc.) may very well be solved 
with a "scope and scrape" procedure (as my ENT calls it).

It's difficult in the NE simply because most people have such 
thick membranes from the constant irritation from either
allergies or poor air quality. Those thick membranes sure 
make sinus lifts easy, though!!!!!!! - Kevin Smith

Yes, I have heard of cases like that too, although I haven't 
actually seen any personally.  Cases where the secondary sinus 
infection does not entirely resolve and the mucosal tissue is 
still hypertrophic requiring surgical follow-up by the ENT.  
Perhaps akin to the need for apical curettage in some 
endodontic cases in spite of our best non-surgical efforts. - Rod

Kevin, To clarify, the vast majority of rhinosinusitis cases 
are acute with the leading cause being ostial blockage from
mucosal edema in response to an allergen.  These clearly have 
nothing to do with dental pathosis, although they can cause
a patient to experience "molar tooth pain" due to pressure and 
anatomic proximity or heterotropic convergence from the
sensitive ostium.

The 40+ percentage is not of "all sinusitis", but is rather a 
percentage of only the chronic, non-resolving cases that
have not responded to antibiotic, adjunctive or surgical therapies.

I share your appreciation of CT imaging in diagnosis, but I should 
clarify that under no circumstances do I use them to
"diagnose" a sinusitis, rather to aid in my dental diagnosis.  
I leave the sinus diagnosis to the ENT's.  I just hope
they reciprocate by leaving the dental diagnosis to me. :-))) - Rod

On 10/30/06 5:27 AM, "Kevin Smith" wrote:

But, for the case that started this thread, how does the patient not get
superior care at the scan center down the street and the scope and
diagnostics/treatment from a radiologist and ENT?  And everything is
covered by medical insurance so out of pocket for most patients is nill.

If you think that patients won't revolt over $300 scans they could get for
free down the street you're fooling yourself.  It is also a bit of a
disservice to the patient by not utilizing their medical coverage in a
scan center environment.  For most offices, this is a big deal simply
because for most patients it's a big deal.

OK, less radiation on an occasional problem, I'll give you that one.  But,
in the overall scheme of things, is that significant to you?  Is that the
over-riding factor for the purchase of this machine for the GP or the
Endodontist? You'd still need to get the scan and the patient to the ENT
for further evaluation.

Kevin, Youíve mentioned this a few times.  Allow me to comment. I personally 
do not call for a CT scan for anyoneís diagnosis but my own.  We are the 
clinicians with the education and experience to diagnose or rule out 
conditions with an odontogenic etiology.  If the patient or another doctor 
would like to see the scan for their own diagnostic purposes in
their area of expertise, the scan is certainly is available to them.  
I may even request their input on occasion and
I have several ENTís I work with. hey also call on me.

As I said in an earlier reply to you, I leave the sinus diagnosis to the 
ENTís, and I would hope they reciprocate by leaving the dental diagnosis to me

I assure you from many past experiences that the patient does not automatically 
get superior care at the scan center down the street nor from diagnostics/treatment 
from a radiologist and just any ENT, especially if the etiology of the sinus
infection is dental.

Prior to the convenience and significantly reduced cost (and reduced rads) 
of digital CTís like the iCat, I would send my difficult diagnostic cases for 
a full coronal CT scan which ran about $1000 per scan.  I didnít do too many 
of these due to the cost.  Even a limited coronal CT (about 16-18  3mm cuts), 
which is pretty worthless diagnostically compared to an iCat still costs 
about $250.

Here is a view of one from back in 2003.  I didnít order this one, but the 
patient paid for the scan and another couple hundred bucks for a radiologistís 
diagnosis who said her CT was clear.  He found no abnormalities.  I could scan 
and post his report.

I requested to see the CT prior to my endodontic dx.

Take a look at this coronal cut through the upper left second bicuspid.
See anything abnormal?
Dx: necrotic pulp tooth #13 with CAP and secondary mucositis in the left 
maxillary antrum. Here are the radiographs:

This patientís condition was diagnosed and successfully treated, despite the expertise and imaging at the scan center down the street. Her chronic symptoms have resolved. Iíve got some other interesting examples of the superior care of some ENTís if youíd care to see it - Rod Thank you rod. At last a voice of reason. As far as fees, your scans are a relative bargain. In our area 300-350 is more the going rate, which is still a bargain both dollar wise, convenience wise, and total body exposure wise over medical grade ct - Gary Gary, I would add that they are also much better diagnostics wise, because you can essentially move through the bone (and sinus) visually in coronal, sagittal, and axial dimensions with virtually infinite cuts, as opposed to being held to only one dimension with limited cuts on the medical grade scans. Especially the limited CTís with those 3 to 4 mm sections, looking for periapical pathology, etc. is extremely hit and miss. Weíve got another OS in our area with an iCat who I spoke with yesterday. They charge $290 for a scan - Rod Hey Rod, Great application of a great technology. I believe there is a tremendous application for CT scans in endodontics and have observed many interesting endodontic situations that were also not visible with conventional x-rays through the use of i-CAT CBCT. Disclaimer: I have a mobile i-CAT and sell i-CAT imaging services to other dentists. Regardless, I had really not considered that there would be an important application in endodontics and boy was I wrong. You can't underestimate the value of the third dimension in any application. Question: did you get just these views form the imaging center or did you get the volume and then slice out the views you wanted? Great case and images. - Arturo Arturo, Thanks. Originally, I would ask for specific slices and views of what I wanted, but about 9 months ago I received the beta program that allows me to get the volume on disc and then slice out any image I choose. This is incredibly valuable technology and I believe has a place in endodontics, particularly in the maxillary posterior region for MSDO cases and where radiographs can be difficult to read, as well as locating the IA nerve and mental foramen prior to mandibular surgery. I certainly donít have the number of case applications to warrant purchasing one for my office, but I never hesitate to send a patient to my OS buddy who has one if it will aid in my diagnosis - Rod The use of cone beam tomography in endo was presented at the ada in vegas in the cone beam course i attended by the director of the radiology group at usc - Arturo John, I just emailed Rod, it's a great work up, but with the mesial restorative under the margins...I would have just done endodontics, perhaps a test cavity (but I've had those lie) - Joey D Very, very interesting workup Rod. But you forgot something. Look again. Take your endodontist glasses off. :-))) How much are the iCats in your area? Can you post larger images for us to look at? This is a great diagnostic case. I'm gonna use it in my next lecture. Thanks. - John Hey John, My OS charges $250 for each iCat scan. Then he sends it to me on a disc which I keep. The patient gets a disc too if they want. Thatí's not a bad idea cleaning up the cement. I tend to draw a very tight line between my work and the restorative guyís stuff, but I'íve seen a need with some of my referrals to take a more proactive role in certain restorative aspects of my cases. I appreciate your comments - Rod Rod, $250. Not bad. At $250 I might send. At $900, umm.... How do you bill for it? Is it covered by their dental? Medical? Both? And if so, what procedure codes to you use? - John A Khademy John, I donít bill for it, because I didnít do it. The OS bills the patient or their insurance for it. I really don'ít know if the pts medical covers it. I suppose if I ever bought an iCat I would have to find out what codes to use. Its the same thing with a pano. I donít have a machine, but I send the patient for one prior to any mandibular surgery. If their GP doesn'ít have a machine, I'íd send them to my OS. The patient (or their insurance) is billed by the OS. Iím not involved in the transaction even though I requested the image - Rod Iím not sure what coverages are in our area. Patients have covered the costs themselves. If Iím quoting 20-40 k for an implant recon, 300 bucks is not a deal breaker - Gary Icat goes for about 180k, But price is supposed to increase now that schein is marketing, and not to be forgotten is the little matter of 5-7k annual maintenance fee. Sirona is supposed to be about 190k, Illuma about the same. Morita and Newtom are over 200k, and Hitachi over 300k - Gary Hi John, I always love your insight buddy. Let me guess. The big chunk of cement on the mesial #15 margin. I know I talked to the referring doc about it and he removed it right after my RCT. Youí'll see it is gone on the follow up scan. Anything else??? I believe the iCats run about 150K base, but you can get to over 200K pretty quick with a few bells and whistles. I haven'ít officially priced them out just talked to my OS buddy about it. Iíll send you some larger images to your personal email to not overload too many mailboxes. Crop and draw all you want bud - Rod Rod, I don't think it's just cement on the mesial under the bridge... In any case, the extent of it led me to think "That's probably it" - Jeoy D I think it is just the cement - Guy The i-CAT is ~$170,000. I think it is a good purchase for a group of like minded dentistrs - Arturo

Nice curves in mesial canal
Apical periodontits
Type III dens case
5 canaled molar
necrosis periradicular..
Triple paste pulpectomy
Endo cases - Marcia
"C" shaped canal anatomy
Psycho molar
routine case
straight lingual
Doomed tooth
another molar
Tooth #36
Instrument removal
Tooth #27
Horror case
Troughing case
6 year recall
9 clinical cases
Flareup after best treatment
Apex locators
Access pictures
Implants #18, #19
Nice retrofil
Molars with lesions
Access pictures
New dental products II
New dental products
Difficult retreatment
Canal anatomy 46
Freak case
huge lateral canal
Separate MB canal
Crown infraction
5 year recall
Palatal canals
TF retreatment
Another molar
Bio race cases