|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
Evidence-Based Dentistry (2007) 8, 15–16.
doi:10.1038/sj.ebd.6400467
Calcium hydroxide has limited effectiveness in eliminating bacteria from human root canal When patients undergo root canal treatment, does calcium hydroxide medication eliminate residual bacteria? Abstract Conclusions Based on the current best available evidence, calcium hydroxide has limited effectiveness in eliminating bacteria from human root canals, when assessed by culture techniques. The quest for better antibacterial protocols and sampling techniques must continue to ensure that bacteria can be reliably eradicated prior to obturation. |
||||||||||||||||
|
Most frequently visited and
popular pages in Dental India site The opinions and views expressed in this newsletter are not ours and authors have been given due credit | ||||||||||||||||
|
NOVALAR
presents results from successful studies of anesthetic reversal agent at
International Association of Dental Research Annual
Meeting | ||||||||||||||||
|
Dental conferences Dental journals Popular pages Patient information dental tourism mb2 New additons Patient education tools | ||||||||||||||||
|
New pages added this
week
removal of titanium
posts Treatment of a horizontal rooth fracture some curves cracked tooth canal projectors calcified premolar community dentistry color map of dentin could have been a nice case Chloroform to soften gutta percha Are you biting off .... crack and bone loss Delayed eruption of teeth Breaking away from managed care Bridge cement question Anterior teeth trauma Squirt obturation technique 15 minute molar Sinus tract healing Avulsion case Bruxism case Coronal decay calcification and the scope 4 year follow up of trauma Questions for Sterilox users horizontal hemostat technique Histogram Infection related resorption biofilms percussive sensitivity Endo tips Optimized ozone Lost case preparation with one NiTi rotary Nacked eye believers abstracts Not an implant case Diagnosis and documentation Educative case |
Top pages visited by vistors to www.dentalindia.com
www.dentalindia.com/wistooth.html www.dentalindia.com/dentalcoll.html www.dentalindia.com/dentourism.html www.dentalindia.com/drugs.html www.dentalindia.com/jokes.html www.dentalindia.com/diapositive.html www.dentalindia.com/ukaus.html www.dentalindia.com/senst.html www.dentalindia.com/tqa.html www.dentalindia.com/nobr.html www.dentalindia.com/rrgums.html www.dentalindia.com/dealers.html www.dentalindia.com/dterms.html www.dentalindia.com/marga9.html www.dentalindia.com/secmolar.html www.dentalindia.com/abcs.html www.dentalindia.com/cusa.html www.dentalindia.com/journals.html www.dentalindia.com/pett.html www.dentalindia.com/webdis2.html www.dentalindia.com/comments.html www.dentalindia.com/gold.html www.dentalindia.com/miracle.html www.dentalindia.com/mef.html www.dentalindia.com/newpro.html www.dentalindia.com/anesthe.html www.dentalindia.com/calci.html www.dentalindia.com/courses.html www.dentalindia.com/disxray.html www.dentalindia.com/laser1.html www.dentalindia.com/ppoint.html www.dentalindia.com/sinlift.html www.dentalindia.com/10myths.html www.dentalindia.com/denconf.html www.dentalindia.com/ginlay.html www.dentalindia.com/iden.html www.dentalindia.com/bleed.html www.dentalindia.com/ccamal.html www.dentalindia.com/diup170806.html www.dentalindia.com/latnews.html www.dentalindia.com/marga14.html | |||||||||||||||
|
Comparative outcome analysis of endodontic
treatment and single implant restoration
J. CARTER, D. JONES, E. SOLOMON, and J. HE, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX, USA Endodontic treatment and implant-supported restoration are both viable treatment options to restore the functionality and esthetics of the dentition. Both treatment modalities have high success rate and predictability. Clinical decision making is often influenced by many factors in addition to success rate such as cost, time, function, and esthetics. Patient perception and preference play an important role in the ultimate clinical decision making. Objective: the purpose of this study was to compare endodontic treatment (Endo) and single implant restoration (Implant) regarding time to function, cost, and patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: 254 patient satisfaction surveys were sent to patients who received single implant restoration or endodontic treatment in the posterior mandible at Baylor College of Dentistry. Survey questions included patient satisfaction towards the cost, duration of the treatment, appearance and the ability to eat after the treatment. 53 responses from Endo patients and 36 responses from Implant patients were received. Treatment records of responded patients were reviewed to record the duration of the treatment, number of visits, treatment protocol, post-op intervention, and cost. Patient survey results were evaluated using Pearson chi square analysis to determine difference in the response to each question between the groups. Overall satisfaction was analyzed by Student's t-test using a derived summative score. Results: Time to function was significantly longer in
Implant patients compared to Endo. Implant also required more post-op
interventions. Endo patients were significantly more likely to report
satisfaction with treatment cost (p<0.05) and less likely to report
dissatisfaction regarding treatment duration, as compared to Implant
patients (p<0.05). However, there is no statistical difference in
overall satisfaction between the two groups. Conclusion: Implant treatment
requires more time and intervention to achieve function compared to Endo
treatment. This delay causes significant dissatisfaction among patients.
However, Endo and Implant treatments have similar overall patient
satisfaction. | ||||||||||||||||