Previous Newsletter     Back to homepage     Next newsletter

Dental India
 
the premium dental site completed 6th successful year of online , entered 7th  year on 23rd Feb 2004

  • Only "Ratio Method" processing technology based electronic Apex Locator in the world - Hence the only best device in the world - A fact corroborated by 5 star Reality rating of "Reality's Choice"  
 
Dental India Newsletter -  4th July 2004
 
- Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Etching Adhesive
- 2003 ADA Mercury Hygiene Recommendations
- Please help us to update our database
               
Harpoon technique
 
The "harpoon" technique is essentially a method of filling the
canal with gutta percha but without lateral condensation. First,
trial fit your master cone, then remove the cone and fill the canal
with EndoREZ using the NaviTip. Then seat your master cone.
After the master cone is in place, you "harpoon" in additional
cones to the side, but without using any lateral force. The
accessory cones are simply placed loosely in the canal.

Courtesy --Dave Maxwell, ROOTS
                
 
- We value your feedbackPlease send your comments and suggestions on this newsletter 
(www.dentalindia.com) -  the only professional Indian dental site
Dental India Group - largest group of  11,000 dentists and growing stronger....
(forward this mail to your colleagues and friends)  
Please fill up the database and mail it to us if you have not done so far
 

Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Etching Adhesive (1/04)

Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. Turkun SL. J Dent 2003;31:527-534.

DBAThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray, New York, NY) and a two-step etch&rinse adhesive (Prime&Bond NT, Dentsply, Milford, DE) in non-carious Class V restorations at two years. Ninety-eight composite resin restorations were placed by one operator in 32 patients.  Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray, New York, NY) hybrid composite resin was used with Clearfil SE Bond and Spectrum TPH hybrid composite resin (Dentsply, Milford, DE) was place with Prime&Bond NT.   The restorations were evaluated according to the modified Ryge criteria at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months.  At two years, 88 restorations were reviewed and recurrent caries, anatomic form, and post-operative sensitivity were rated favorably (100% alpha) for all restorations.  Only a few cases from both adhesive systems showed marginal discoloration.  The retention rates were not significantly different with 93% of the Clearfil SE Bond and 91% of the Prime&Bond NT restorations retained. The authors concluded that both adhesive systems exhibited very good clinical performance at the end of two years.

DIS Comment:  Recently, multiple self-etching adhesive systems have been introduced to the dental profession.  Clinical studies are necessary to evaluate their performance over time.  Adhesives have mainly been tested clinically in non-prepared cervical abrasions and erosions because these lesions are common and are located primarily in dentin.  Laboratory studies have shown a definite overall downward trend in bond strengths with self-etching systems, especially with the one-step version.A notable exception, however, is Clearfil SE, a two-step self-etching adhesive which has provided excellent bond strengths in the laboratory and has now been shown to be successful clinically in class V lesions. 1,2  In general, DIS recommends caution with any new adhesive agent until well-controlled, longer-term clinical studies become available.

References
1.  Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargus M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
2.  Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Lambrechts P. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions. J Dent Res 2003;82:abstr #0911.

(Col Vandewalle)


2003 ADA Mercury Hygiene Recommendations (1/04)

2003 ADA Council on Scientific Affairs Mercury Hygiene Recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1498-1499.

The ADA Council on Scientific Affairs has recently updated its 1999 mercury hygiene recommendations.1 The overall goal is to ensure the safety of all dental personnel and minimize the release of mercury into the environment.  However, the Council on Scientific Affairs maintain that this update is not intended to establish a standard of care or to set requirements that must be followed in all cases. 

Dental personnel can be exposed to mercury through direct skin contact with mercury or freshly mixed dental amalgam or through exposure to the following sources of mercury vapors: accidental mercury spills; malfunctioning amalgamators, leaky amalgam capsules or malfunctioning bulk mercury dispensers (the ADA recommends against the use of bulk elemental mercury); trituration, placement and condensation of amalgam; polishing or removal of amalgam; vaporization of mercury from contaminated instruments; and open storage of amalgam scrap or used capsules.  The following are mercury hygiene recommendations designed to reduce potential mercury exposure:

GENERAL MERCURY HYGIENE RECOMMENDATIONS
- Train all personnel involved in the handling of mercury and dental amalgam regarding the potential hazards of mercury vapor and the necessity of practicing proper mercury hygiene.
- Remove professional clothing before leaving the workplace.
OFFICE ENGINEERING
- Work in well-ventilated work areas, with fresh air exchanges and outside exhaust. The air-conditioning filters should be replaced periodically.
- Use proper work area design to facilitate spill containment and cleanup. Floor coverings should be nonabsorbent, seamless and easy to clean. The Council does not recommend the use of carpeting in operatories, where an accidental mercury spill might occur. Chemical decontamination of carpeting may not be effective, as mercury droplets can seep through the carpet and remain inaccessible to the decontaminant. Removal of the contaminated carpet may be the only way to ensure decontamination.
- Periodically check the dental operatory for mercury vapor. This may be done using dosimeter badges or through the use of mercury vapor analyzers for rapid assessment after any mercury spill or cleanup procedure. The current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard for mercury is 0.1 milligram per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour work shift.2 The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has recommended the permissible exposure limit to be changed to 0.05 mg/m2 averaged over an eight-hour work shift over a 40-hour workweek,3 but OSHA has not yet adopted this recommendation.
HYGIENE RECOMMENDATIONS DURING PREPARATION AND PLACEMENT OF AMALGAM
- Use only capsulated amalgam alloys. The ADA recommends against the use of bulk alloy and bulk elemental (i.e., raw liquid) mercury in the dental office.
- Use an amalgamator with a completely enclosed arm.
- If possible, recap single-use capsules after use, store them in a closed container and recycle them.
- Use care when handling amalgam. Avoid skin contact with mercury or freshly mixed amalgam.
- Use high-volume evacuation systems (fitted with traps or filters) when finishing or removing amalgam.
MANAGEMENT OF MERCURY SPILLS
In case of an accidental mercury spill (regardless of size), the Council endorses the following recommendations4:
- Never use a vacuum cleaner to clean up the mercury.
- Never use household cleaning products to clean up the spill, particularly those containing ammonia or chlorine.
- Never allow mercury to go down the drain.
- Never use a broom or a paintbrush to clean up the mercury.
- Never allow people whose shoes may be contaminated with mercury to walk around or leave the spill area until the mercury-contaminated items have been removed.

MANAGEMENT OF SMALL MERCURY SPILLS
A spill is considered small if there are less than 10 grams of mercury present (no larger than a quarter).5,6 Small spills can be cleaned safely using commercially available mercury cleanup kits and by observing the steps listed in the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s “Management of Mercury Spills” table.7

MANAGEMENT OF LARGE MERCURY SPILLS
A mercury spill is considered large if there are more than 10 g of mercury present (larger than the size of a quarter).5,6 Cleanup of large mercury spills requires experienced environmental personnel.

DIS Comment: The updated ADA Council of Scientific Affairs mercury hygiene guidelines provides mercury hygiene recommendations in a more user-friendly format.   It recommends against the use of carpet in dental operatories and gives additional guidance on the management of mercury spills.   

Professional clothing (e.g., clinical attire, smocks) is provided at all USAF dental clinics. Concerning office engineering, the recommendations address three areas: ventilation, floor covering, and mercury vapor monitoring. 

Military clinic design standards meet ventilation recommendations outlined in the article.  It is interesting to note that although the replacement of air conditioning filters may be beneficial for other health reasons, commercial air conditioning filters are designed for the collection of airborne particulate matter and have no effect on mercury vapor.  The only filters that have been shown to help reduce mercury vapor levels contain specific chemical absorbents (usually iodized charcoal).3-5

All USAF facilities designed or remodeled IAW federal guidelines  adhere to the updated recommendation of not having carpet in dental operatories.   Concerning the monitoring of dental operatories for mercury vapor, the recommendation is vague as to what constitutes periodic monitoring.  As per AFI 48-145 surveillance need and frequency of mercury vapor monitoring is determined by Bioenvironmental Engineering (BEE).  If elevated mercury vapor levels are suspected, dental commanders should contact BEE IAW AFOSH Standard 48-8.  Typically, mercury vapor levels are monitored only after suspected or identified mercury exposure (e.g., after a mercury spill).  Consultation with local BEE personnel will determine what schedule (if any) is required by federal or local requirements. 

The recommendations provide excellent information concerning the management of mercury spills.  DIS has published a synopsis of commercially available mercury spill kits. In the event of a mercury spill that cannot be managed in the dental clinic, contact local BEE and Civil Engineer personnel for assistance.

References

Military Handbook 1191, 9 July 2002.

Eames WB, Palmertree CO. Twelve dental mercury devices: an evaluation of methods of monitoring, containment, and removal of mercury. Oper Dent 1980;5:72-81.

Koski RE, Kantor J, Gough EJ. Controlling mercury vapor within the dental operatory. CDA J 1981;9:33-39.

Brown D. The decontamination of a mercury-polluted room with iodized-charcoal filter fans. Br Dent J 1984;156:453-454.

(Col Roberts)


Please send the form duly filled in to praba@dentalindia.com

Please help us to update our database

(We request members who are yet to furnish their data
to find time to fillup these details and send it to us!)
 
Name :  Dr
Mr/Mrs/Miss : 
(names of Spouse and children
who are also Dentists)
 
Address:
 
City:
PIN:

Date of Birth:
Profession  :
Experience  :         YEARS
Clinic Name :

Address:

City:

Pincode:
Phone with std code (R) :
Phone with std code (C) :
Phone with std code (off) :
Cell :
E-mail :
 
Internet experience:
own website if any:
Qualification :
Graduation Year :
Graduation College :
 
Specialization :
Post Graduate College :

Your comment about
 
Dental India News Digests

Dental India website:
www.dentalindia.com