This page is a very popular one and frequently visited
Other frequently visited and most popular pages  |   Dental India home page

   

Previous newsletters     29-04-2007     20-05-2007     27-05-2007     03-06-2007     10-06-2007     17-06-2007

Dental India Newsletter - 24th June 2007

Dental India newsletter dated 24th June 2007 -  10th year of online in Feb 2007

Endodontology
 
Bacteriologic investigation of the effects of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine during the endodontic treatment of
teeth with apical periodontitis
 
José F. Siqueira Jr. DDS, PhD a, ,  , Isabela N. Rôças DDS, PhD a, Simone S.M. Paiva DDS b, Tatiana Guimarães-Pinto
DDS b, Karen M. Magalhães DDS b and Kenio C. Lima DDS, PhD c
aProfessor, Estácio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
bGraduate students, Master's Program in Endodontics, Estácio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
cProfessor, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Received 27 December 2006;  revised 8 January 2007;  accepted 21 January 2007.  Available online 11 May 2007.
 
Objective
 
This clinical study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 0.12%
chlorhexidine digluconate as irrigants in reducing the cultivable bacterial populations in infected root canals of
teeth with apical periodontitis.
 
Study design
 
According to stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria, 32 teeth with primary intraradicular infections and chronic
apical periodontitis were selected and followed in the study. Bacterial samples were taken at the baseline (S1) and
after chemomechanical preparation using either NaOCl (n = 16) or chlorhexidine (n = 16) as irrigants (S2). Cultivable
bacteria recovered from infected root canals at the 2 stages were counted. Isolates from S2 samples were identified by
means of 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
 
Results
 
At S1, all canals were positive for bacteria, and the median number of bacteria per canal was 7.32 × 105 for the NaOCl
group and 8.5 × 10 5 for the chlorhexidine group. At S2, the median number of bacteria in canals irrigated with NaOCl
and chlorhexidine was 2.35 × 103 and 2 × 102, respectively. Six of 16 (37.5%) canals from the NaOCl group and 8 of 16
(50%) canals from the chlorhexidine group yielded negative cultures. Chemomechanical preparation using either solution
substantially reduced the number of cultivable bacteria in the canals. No significant difference was observed between
the NaOCl and chlorhexidine groups with regard to the number of cases yielding negative cultures (P = .72) or
quantitative bacterial reduction (P = .609). The groups irrigated with NaOCl or chlorhexidine showed a mean number of
1.3 and 1.9 cultivable species per canal, respectively. The great majority of isolates in S2 were from gram-positive
bacteria, with streptococci as the most prevalent taxa.
 
Conclusions
 
The present findings revealed no significant difference when comparing the antibacterial effects of 2.5% NaOCl and
0.12% chlorhexidine used as irrigants during the treatment of infected canals.

There is a shortage of dentists in the UK and one recruitment company decided to sell a dentist on auction:  Selling dentists in Auction !  (if the link does not work, just go to www.ebay.co.uk and type in the search box: get yourself a dentist )

New additions to dental india site
Previous newsletter   |   previous weekly update    |    Top 100 pages    |  New additions
Most frequently visited and popular pages in Dental India site
Forward this newsletter to your friends:  let them click here to receive this FREE newsletter
Visitors to Dental India site this week from 160 countries
Dental India is FIRST in all major search engines

The opinions and views expressed in this newsletter are not ours and authors have been given due credit

Clinical Oral Implants Research
Volume 18 Issues3 Page 15-19, June 2007
 
To cite this article: Poul Holm-Pedersen, Niklaus P. Lang, Frauke Müller (2007)
What are the longevities of teeth and oral implants?
Clinical Oral Implants Research 18 (s3), 1519.
doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01434.x
 
Abstract
 
What are the longevities of teeth and oral implants?
Poul Holm-Pedersen 11Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark,
Niklaus P. Lang 22School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland and
Frauke Müller 33Section de médecine dentaire, Université de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
1Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
3Section de médecine dentaire, Université de Genève, Genève, Switzerland
Correspondence to:
Prof. Dr odont. Poul Holm-Pedersen
Copenhagen Gerontological Oral Health Research Center
Faculty of Health Sciences
School of Dentistry
University of Copenhagen
Nørre Allé 20 DK- 2200
Copenhagen N, Denmark.
 
To cite this article:
Holm-Pedersen P, Lang NP, Müller F. What are the longevities of teeth and oral implants?
Clin. Oral Impl. Res . 18 (Suppl. 3), 2007; 1519
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01434.x
 
Abstract
 
Objective: To analyse tooth loss and to evaluate the longevity of healthy teeth and teeth compromised by diseases and
influenced by therapy as well as that of oral implants.
 
Material and methods: On the basis of an electronic and manual search using key words for survival, success, longevity
of teeth, longevity of implants, epidemiology, periodontally compromised, endodontically compromised, risk for tooth
extraction 49 full-text articles were identified to construct a traditional review. Among these, six systematic
reviews addressing longevity were found.
 
Results: Tooth loss is a complex outcome, it is influenced by the extent of dental caries and its sequelae and/or the
presence or absence of periodontitis as well as the decisions taken by dentists when evaluating possible risk factors
for rendering successful therapy. In addition, tooth loss is related to behavioural and socio-economic factors and
associated morbidity and cultural priorities. Generally, teeth surrounded by healthy periodontal tissues yield a very
high longevity (up to 99.5% over 50 years). If periodontally compromised, but treated and maintained regularly, the
survival of such teeth is still very high (92–93%). Likewise, endodontically compromised, but successfully treated
devital teeth yield high survival and success rates. The survival of oral implants after 10 years varies between 82%
and 94%.
 
Conclusions: Teeth will last for life, unless they are affected by oral diseases or service interventions. Many
retained teeth thus may be an indicator of positive oral health behaviour throughout the life course. Tooth longevity
is largely dependent on the health status of the periodontium, the pulp or periapical region and the extent of
reconstructions. Multiple risks lead to a critical appraisal of the value of a tooth. Oral implants when evaluated
after 10 years of service do not surpass the longevity of even compromised but successfully treated natural teeth.

Dental conferences      Dental journals     Popular pages  Patient information      dental tourism  &nbs;    mb2    New additons      Patient education tools

pages visited this week
Metallic buildup and crown
lingual nerve injury
To culture or not
Troughing advice II
Double tooth
Post placement
ECIR treatment
Where is MB2?
Uncoveing the MB2
Cyst decompression
3 MB root
Lateral canal
Triple curve
Middle mesial
Microscope merits
Radiogrphic angle
Quadrant Endo
Separate MB2
Non vital case
Endo treatment
Weird Anatomy
Retreatment cases
retreat lower incisors
Calcified molar
Forensic links
FAQ for patients
Full gold crown
Underneath Alloy
Last 5 cases
Tricky diagnosis
Just a molar case
Tricky diagnosis
Fibre glass posts
One year case
Long 2nd molar
Lateral
Bio ethics and bio safety
Ultrasonics,retreatments
tough molar
last two cases
2 canal wisdom tooth
pihany casesChallenging MB2
Stopping bleeding
Tooth #20
some curves
cracked tooth
canal projectors
calcified premolar
Top pages visited by vistors to www.dentalindia.com
http://www.dentalindia.com/wistooth.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/dentalcoll.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/dealers.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/dentourism.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/diapositive.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/drugs.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/fvlinks.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/jokes.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/journals.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/dterms.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/cusa.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/ragas.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/senst.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/mola.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/tqa.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/secmolar.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/rrgums.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/denconf.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/abroad.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/newpro.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/ukaus.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/webdis2.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/anesthe.html
http:/dentalindia.com/skeletal.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/mef.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/nobr.html
http://www.dentalindia.com/iden.html

www.dentalindia.com/dterms.html
www.dentalindia.com/marga9.html
www.dentalindia.com/abcs.html
www.dentalindia.com/pett.html
www.dentalindia.com/comments.html
www.dentalindia.com/gold.html
www.dentalindia.com/miracle.html
www.dentalindia.com/mef.html
www.dentalindia.com/newpro.html
www.dentalindia.com/calci.html
www.dentalindia.com/courses.html
www.dentalindia.com/disxray.html
www.dentalindia.com/laser1.html
www.dentalindia.com/ppoint.html
www.dentalindia.com/sinlift.html
www.dentalindia.com/10myths.html
www.dentalindia.com/ginlay.html
www.dentalindia.com/bleed.html
www.dentalindia.com/ccamal.html
www.dentalindia.com/diup170806.html
www.dentalindia.com/latnews.html
www.dentalindia.com/marga14.html

20 mg toxy


 


the fact that LDD "took off with a bang and then seemed to disappear" does not have much to do with the research
at all, in my opinion. It has to do with MONEY.




 

 


Periostat was patented at 20mg bid. Why not 25mg? Could it be it would be too easy to get a generic doxy 100mg tablet and separate
into four? On Hygienetown awhile back, someone asked if a 25mg dose would have an antibiotic effect. My pharmacist husband helped me
research it out and interpretted the findings, and he concluded it would not. Especially, if you did not take the grains that were
left on the glass slab after cutting the tabs.



So, I believe 20mg was chosen over 25mg so that the product could not only be effective against MMP's, but could be PATENTED. The
patent guarantees the corner on the market for a time. So once there was a pattent, Collagenix could market, Market, MARKET to
bring in the bucks. Once the patent expired and the generic became available, the drug company quit the advertising, because then there would be no money
in it for them. Instead, they turned their focus to marketing a newly patented time release 40mg daily doxy called Oracea for the treatment of Rosacea.



 


So it is not that LDD has lost is usefulness in the periodontal arena; it has simply lost its patent, and the spotlight is shining
on a new star to attract the audiences and, therefore, the MONEY.- Diane.