Horizontal root fractures- Courtesy ROOTS
The opinions within this web page are not ours.
Authors have been credited for the individual posts where they are - www.rxroots.com Photos courtesy: Marga , Winfried Zeppenfeld From: Marga Ree
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:33 PM
To: ROOTS
Subject: [roots] 1 year follow-up of two horizontal root fractures
This 21 year old man was involved in a bar fight. His dentist made a splint and did an attempt to perform rct, but he was not able to instrument
the apical parts. (page 1) He referred the patient to me.
•Consultation:
11 (#8) and 21(#9) horizontal root fractures
•21 (#9) uncomplicated crown fracture
•12 (#7) apical periodontitis
First thing I did is remove the splint, C&S 11 and 21, place Ca(OH)2 and make a filling of composite in # 21.
After 1 month I obturated # 11 and 21 completely with MTA, 12 with gp and AH26 (page 2)
After 3 months he returned for a follow-up, and complained about sensitivity upon biting and palpation of # 11. There was a pocket buccal of
# 11 till the fracture level. I decide to raise a flap and clean the fracture gaps. I applied Emdogain, because I was hoping to prevent apical
downgrowth of the epithelium. (page 3 and 4) Rad on page 4 is immediate follow-up after surgery
1 year follow-up (page 4 and 5): Probing depths of 2 mm, no sensitivity, patient can function without any problems, radiographs show healing.
It is very rewarding treating these trauma patients. - Marga





Marga: incredible as usual. can you clarify for me what you did in the surgical phase in cleaning the fracture gaps.
the healing is just amazing. - Gary
Thanks Gary. I removed the granulation tissue with a lot of embedded root fragments and extruded MTA. - Marga
Marga, Why did you instrument/fill the apical sections? - Robert M. Kaufmann DMD MS(Endo)
Rob, Unfortunately I had to, because the referring dentist already instrumented the apical fragments, as you can see on the first page
(btw: without a rubber dam ). It would have been better if the dentist had left the apical fragments untouched, and had instrumented till the
fracture level. Usually the apical fragments maintain vitality. - Marga
Nice treatment plan, excellent decisions, wonderful documentation! - Liviu
Marga, You are one-of-a-kind. I do not think anyone but you could have done this. - Wes
Fantastic Marga ...............I am sure in most parts of the world the patient would have lost his tooth and would now be having a prosthesis.
You removed the initial splint placed by the refg.dentist and the clinical images don't show a fresh splint So how did you manage to prevent
the mobility during function?? - Sachin
Thanks Sachin! The splint was already 4 weeks in place, and was applied in a way that it didn't serve it's purpose, to put it mildly.
It was more a source of plaque retention and tissue irritation. In addition, according to this paper of Cvek and Andreasen, there is no benefit
of splinting for more than 4 weeks. I adjusted the teeth out of direct and excursive occlusion. - Marga
Dent Traumatol. 2004 Aug;20(4):203-11.
Healing of 400 intra-alveolar root fractures. 2. Effect of treatment factors such as treatment delay, repositioning, splinting type and period
and antibiotics. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Mejare I, Cvek M.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark. rh11323@rh.dk
This is the second part of a retrospective study of 400 root-fractured permanent incisors. In this article, the effect of various treatment
procedures is analyzed. Treatment delay, i.e. treatment later than 24 hrs after injury, did not change the root fracture healing pattern,
healing with hard tissue between fragments (HH1), interposition of bone and/or periodontal ligament (PDL) or pulp necrosis (NEC). When initial
displacement did not exceed 1 mm, optimal repositioning appeared to significantly enhance both the likelihood of pulpal healing and hard
tissue repair (HH1). Significant differences in healing were found among the different splinting techniques. The lowest frequency of healing
was found with cap splints and the highest with fiberglass or Kevlar splints. The latter splinting procedure showed almost the same healing
result as non-splinting. Comparison between non-splinting and splinting for non-displaced teeth was found to reveal no benefit from splinting.
With respect to root fractures with displacement, too few cases were available for analysis. No beneficial effect of splinting periods greater
than 4 weeks could be demonstrated. The administration of antibiotics had the paradoxical effect of promoting both HH1 and NEC. No explanation
could be found. It was concluded that, optimal repositioning seems to favor healing. Furthermore, the chosen splinting method appears to be
related to healing of root fractures, with a preference to pulp healing and healing fusion of fragments to a certain flexibility of the splint
and possibly also non-traumatogenic splint application. Splinting for more than 4 weeks was not found to influence the healing pattern.
A certain treatment delay (a few days) appears not to result in inferior healing. The role of antibiotics upon fracture healing is questionable.
Copyright Blackwell Munksgaard, 2004.
Marga...I'm surprised you did the apical sections....did you have a reason why? - Joey D, "Just curious"
Joey, Yes, I had a good reason, see my previous answer to Rob. - Marga
Marga, Joey, Rob: would it matter at what level the fracture occurred as to whether or not you need to enter the apical segment? - Gary
Gary, Here is a slide of my friend and colleague Michiel de Cleen on the occurence of pulp necrosis in horizontal root fractures,
which is less than 30%. So usually the best approach is to do nothing, and to follow-up very carefully, because there is a big chance
for the tooth to maintain vital. If the coronal segment becomes non-vital, then perform an endo in the coronal part. The apical segment
will show often pulp canal obliteration after a while. - Marga






